Chiang Mai Dapps - 02/25/20 - Cretter: A Critical Thinking Platform Where Your Ideas Are Valuable
Chiang Mai Dapps·Tue, Oct 27, 2020, 12:00 AM
Transcript
all right the next stop is so this is an acronym so come with it Martin do you really pretty low here because so Grindr is something I worked on so just like a back story so I was working on the meat trading platform so many people trading me so I like if you make money you're making money from another user you know there's nothing productive it's just like you speculating and if you bit of speculating then you dig or somebody's money or you can form a game you can like take somebody after that there were just like a very serious congestion problem where if a user wanted to create a meme it took like 2 days because like the media stuff is like its own contract the image is saved in yes but the meeting like the contract was dissolute and so like I think - we're not picking up those they saw you enter like you have to like be really expensive fee or not the press look like little animated oh my oh come on this is not going to work I'm gonna work on a web - I went to Vietnam there's no solution for critical thinking and arguments on the Internet the beginning crack because like so after after some thinking of like on the internet if you have a discussion going on people can provide an engine other ways and you're gonna attract discussion so I was like ok playing I'm really gonna be like the structure is going to be really boring only have one way of discussing there is no reply and retreating and all this comic staying because like people can evade you know when they lost or like do some other tricks so in the little bit also the back to version because I have a feeling like the yeah so tonight is like the moment where I'm like okay I'm gonna decide more I'm still like thinking okay but should I really like build this but like right now it's like she wept to website yeah get evaluate the concept and see like if this is completely ludicrous and go to waste like I don't know like three months of my time or two months so we'll see so I'll just explain the concepts first so the way it works is that or my hand box is like all debates you can come from you can have only have three these statements questions than answers now independence the authoritative part or like the very constraining parts like from the statement you can only have a bunch of questions and for each questions you can only have one answer and based from that answer the same person yeah so only the person who issued that statement can answer your question so like if you view it as like a tree with like you know you have a one front here you have two questions here and the answers here but it's only like one line there's a no no interaction between the things so like you have statement questioners insurance and the this theater here is providing the answer and then afterwards you have the rank so the ranking is like any user on the internet they decide unique user like when you can't vote twice so here it will be like just figuring out they will decide this rifle or it's this irrational or these guys has a bias so the hypothesis here you post the statement based on how how much you believe something is true so let's say you know you believe that okay you know I'll take like a very easy example so let's say you truly believe from we from it like that so let's say you know you believe that we TV goes graphic right so somebody writes that somebody who's really good animated or like trying to invalidate a statement would be like well good anybody P Y doing a handstand or like standing completely reverse so now you're very good in that statement because like they have to prove actually that if you were against if your directions against gravity then you wouldn't be able to be in so that's very hard to demonstrate so that person will be likely to lose in those questions and people who do so here the web conversion I'll show you but here the web free version is like okay and you said funny yeah part you didn't explain it there's somebody pushing a certain amount of money behind their statement and then who's one give any questions and answers how does that go sure so thirty-six limp it's explaining from here from an example so let's say that guy you know truly disease that so he puts $100 on that statement now oh all of the question is right it can be anybody on the internet if you really think that you have a shot of like killing this well you could think of any ideas like the virus or something that you have to like really bad a test to see if it's true so the users are motivated of like okay like there's money in this statement I want to get some of that now the more risk-taking you are and you're aggressive like how much money so the idea is like if there's a $100 on the statement and you know you're ready to you know you feel really confident about impressive you can go from one other ten dollars or whatever contracted for so the earlier you are asking the question and the more aggressive you are so let's say you're putting $10 on your question there is two ways in either lose by foot and you lose by that like this the guy who meets statement providing a very good answer in people who favor that would lose you lose your $10 $10 who goes back to this bank but the statement that so basically you would have $100 will spend hours but then if the questioner really kills the statement you know like this this guy comes up with answer that's no good then this guy instead of losing them no and then the records you know get paid first because like either way like the records here are motivated to rank to rank early we early direct the more so let's say the algorithm could be just simply of like the first three or five people who knew the right answer and concluded first get paid this part I really like I'm a part to the question this part yeah so yeah so here you know you have to stay the stator the questioner the question if he wins yes so let's say the question remains 2x of the questioners stage for like ten dollars so China dollars would goes to him and then ten percent of the questionnaire is thing goes to the record so basically the bank decreased by twenty dollars - ten percent so like a suit so people are motivated to to videos of the big statement to really like quickly draw all that money they're like well this is a fool with a lot of money so in the other case is the questioner if they lost 90 percent goes to so it actually so if the questioner losses here you actually fund the statement or more people need or to to be like Bob now there is a lot more money I'm smarter than Bobby's you know I like bet 20 or 40 and then you know the rancor is whatever happens they still the network's so so here's the general to found like the expansion but like the the long-term dynamics of the contract you know let's say one of very high level is like if you're let's say in accordance to truth then the bank of that payment keeps on growing because people keep trying to ask the factors but they lose so the bank keeps getting bigger so I actually like after two weeks or three weeks whenever based on one parameter you can actually like draw today back like weed more money if you like have like some very round like some really deep true thing like you can people change their minds Kenny their mind these breakers the Rangers yeah like so let's say you vote and then after just change your room yeah so like if let's say you make a false statement saying that the world is flat and then you get five people who go yeah it's like yeah and then they go they all say the world is flat and then they say watch the YouTube documentary where the watch some YouTube back memories educate himself and then a bunch of other people piling and they go no that's all false can the people who educate themselves and realize the truth that the world isn't flat can they change their minds or are they stuck with those positions I think there's but if you actually believe it you know that you should be committed to your position to be effective and like if you don't allow people to change their votes then you can solidify a pretty tactical it's your the statue because if people can't change their their - and you know that you don't have and if you know you have enough people to overwhelm them and they can't change it regardless of the actual truth then you can totally destroy the truth with this at least in this world yeah so absolutely great getting definitely so like like all games you could like count again you can do but then you know we'll talk about one god functionality I mean that's just in a little bit so I believe so let's say you have a phosphate look like let's say you know you pee because of gravity what's happening it's like you know you have like $100 beating and then very quickly it collapses basically because like people keep asking me questions and waiting so they draw all the money from out of nothing so the concept here the high-level concept is like whatever it's true persist and that grows and whatever he's alive in classes
Automatic transcript — names and jargon may be misspelled.